The safety profile of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) "vaccines" seems to be widely dependent upon the batch from which a given injection comes. Some batches are exceptionally toxic, a new review has found, while others are slightly less toxic. | London-based researcher Craig Paardekooper figured this all out via data he collected from the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). He learned that "one in 200 of the [covid vaccine] batches are highly toxic," while the vast majority of them are not as toxic, at least in the shorter term. "In fact, 70 percent of the batches for the vaccine-only produce one adverse reaction report in total," Paardekooper writes, adding that "80 percent of the vaccine batches only produce one or two adverse reaction reports." Upon closer look, Paardekooper discovered that certain anomaly batches "produced thousands of times the number of adverse reactions." These batches stand out from the vast majority of other batches in that one caused 1,012 adverse reactions, another caused 1,394 adverse reactions, and another caused 4,911 adverse reactions. The people unfortunate enough to have gotten jabbed from one of the really toxic batches are now either dead or seriously injured, with little, if any, chance at recovering.

■ Discussion about Vax Lot Variability Data and What it Means (VIDEO) [Sasha Latypova:] We talked about lot-to-lot analysis of C-19 injections from the Danish government data by Max Schmeling, a statistician/economist. In the video I am referring to this graph and the fact that the blue and green dots are so cleanly separated into very distinct groups. The yellow ones are also extremely different from the blue and statistically different from the green. The empty space in between is also telling. While there is a huge variability lot-to-lot - which would be bad enough as it indicates uncontrolled manufacturing. However, the fact that the 3 groups are so distinct from each other shows that this variation is not random. It shows a clear pattern which indicates intent, and experimental design or a targeted deployment. In this case there are clearly small extremely toxic lots (blue) introduced among medium-low and low toxicity lots which are larger in size. Craig Paardekooper found the same issue - non random patterns in the toxicity of lots early on in the roll out campaign.

■ COVID Was A Military Operation & The Shots Are Bio-Weapons’ (Sasha Latypova) (VIDEO)

Dmitry Medvedev (Дмитрий Медведев) | Kissinger called for Ukraine's admission to NATO. He is, of course, 100 years old in ten days, and he still met with Brezhnev. However, here he is completely wrong. He called the conflict between the United States and China the main threat to humanity. I have always believed that for a correct assessment of the situation it is important to consider not a hypothetical, but a direct and clear threat. Let's imagine that Ukraine was accepted into the North Atlantic Alliance by its current meager leaders:

   1 ) NATO is already engaged in hybrid warfare with our country;
   2 ) the Ukrainian nationalist regime will not give up trying to regain lost territories;
   3 ) we will have to respond to this harshly by all possible means and...
   4 ) Here is Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.

Subtle reasoning about preventing existential threats does not work in bloody conflicts. This should be clear even to those approaching the centennial. (Translation: DeepL.com)