Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack
Insurgents in Syria take responsibility for chemical weapons attack
which the U-S and its allies are blaming on the Syrian government.
Militants in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta admitted to Dale Gav-
lak - a freelance AP journalist who broke the story for Mint Press
News, that they received the chemical weapons from Saudi Arabia.
Insurgents in Syria take responsibility for chemical weapons attack
● As the machinery for a U.S.-led military intervention in Syria gathers pace following last week’s chemical weapons attack, the U.S. and its allies may be targeting the wrong culprit.
● Interviews with people in Damascus and Ghouta, a suburb of the Syrian capital, where the humanitarian agency Doctors Without Borders said at least 355 people had died last week from what it believed to be a neurotoxic agent, appear to indicate as much.
● U.S Secretary of State John Kerry saying Monday that Assad’s guilt was “a judgment … already clear to the world.” However, from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack.
● In a recent article for Business Insider, reporter Geoffrey Ingersoll highlighted Saudi Prince Bandar’s role in the two-and-a-half year Syrian civil war. Many observers believe Bandar, with his close ties to Washington, has been at the very heart of the push for war by the U.S. against Assad.
Gilad Atzmon: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack ● I do not possess the means to verify how credible the following report is. It suggests that it was actually Syrian forces’ conventional artillery and missiles that hit rebel’s WMD storage. If the report is genuine, it would be consistent with the American intelligence account: Assad's forces indeed fired rockets and artillery at the time of the alleged chimical attack, yet the rockets were of a conventional nature. The meaning of it is simple, the rebels posses WMD supplied by foreign agents and the conflict is about to escalate into a genocidal warfare, an unfolding tragedy. What we need is divine intervention as opposed to Zionist immoral interventionist pathology.
Patrick Martin: Report links US-backed Syrian opposition to Ghouta gas attack
Al-Manar TV: Syrian Army Kills 40 al-Nusra Front Members in Damascus Ambush