On Accomplices in the Terrorist Act Committed on March 22 in Crocus City Hall

Dmitry Medvedev (Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council) (Дмитрий Медведев) |On accomplices in the terrorist act committed on March 22 in Crocus City Hall | As it is known, in criminal law it is customary to distinguish complicity in the commission of a crime, when several persons intentionally participate in it. Let's analyze who became accomplices of this gravest criminal act.

1. The executors. Everything is clear with them: these underdeveloped bastards are caught, and investigative actions are carried out with them. And it is obvious that despite multiple references to their belonging to ISIS/Wilayat Khorasan* (a terrorist organization banned in Russia), these scum are not religious fanatics ready to die for their faith. Neither external nor internal paraphernalia have they demonstrated. They are primitive hired killers, hired for relatively little money and trained to shoot. Just animals, human scum.

2. The organizers. They are a bit more complicated, for which the legend of IS responsibility was developed, which the extremists were happy to confirm. But they always do this, to increase their capital. And no one canceled the money, they probably got their money. But the true organizers are still hiding in the shadow of the IS. That's the plan. But already the first information published from the phones of hired freaks unambiguously testifies to the nationality of the organizers. As well as many other things — open (destination) and so far closed. These are the officials of the Nazi “Ukraine.” It was in their ugly brains that the idea to compensate for failures at the front with terrorist attacks was born, which, however, is not surprising. They will have to answer either according to the law or otherwise. The way terrorists are being dealt with all over the world. No statute of limitations.

3. The accomplices. There are many. Their circle expanded to include those who gave property, and money, organized the movement, taught them to shoot, etc. They will be held accountable. Everything is clear with them too, and they will answer. More interesting are other accomplices or international sponsors of terrorists. And here, alas, the situation is as follows: they include top officials of NATO countries. They vary. Macron, for example. His rhetoric, his actions, and most importantly — his sanctions for secret operations with the Bandera regime may well be qualified as aiding and abetting the terrorist attack of March 22. That is why the lover of oysters and champagne got so shitfaced that he had to deny publicly his own and his subordinates' involvement in the March 22 terrorist attack. That's why the champagne oyster lover is so shitfaced that he had to publicly deny France's involvement in the attack himself and through his subordinates. It is clear that Macron and several other Western leaders are the sponsors of this horrific terrorist attack. There is no forgiveness for this. There is no immunity here. And from now on, they simply are the enemies of Russia. (Translation: DeepL + Grammarly)