RE Toulouse killer: Having a handler, that is not an innocent thing
A list that puts this issue completely to bed:
1) When under attack, the patsy attempts to reach out for help from his intelligence handler (with plenty of government lies claiming they had no connection in the patsy, no knowledge of him, and no reason to place him on any list of possible dangers).
2) A patsy assassinated when he could have been taken alive (and then defended himself by stating his mission was authorized by the French government)
3) A 'radical Islamist terrorist' with no interest in religion.
4) The first killer was obviously a different person (based on witness descriptions), a fact ignored by the media and government.
5) Sent to Israel, of all places, using cover provided by a French intelligence agency (the Jewish targets seem to be part of a Zionist plan to scare French Jews to flee to Israel).
6) An inexplicable cache of weapons.
7) Travels to Afghanistan and Pakistan, suspected of training at 'al-Qaeda' training camps, picked up by the Americans, and just sent home?
No, this was an authorized French intelligence operation - coordinated with the American and Israeli governments - to assist in Sarko's reelection (and prod French Jews into helping with the 'demographic problem' in Israel). This is so clear it is not worthy of discussion.
Le Parisien: Abdelkader Merah confirme l’existence d’un troisième homme