US concerned over Israel "security"
In an effort to woo Israel after nearly a month of tense relations, Washington warns Iran and Syria against “making threats” to Tel Aviv's security. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made an attempt to make amends with Tel Aviv officials after relations hit an unprecedented low last month over an Israeli settlement project on occupied Palestinian lands in East Jerusalem (Al-Quds). Clinton, who was addressing the annual meeting of the American Jewish Committee, struck a conciliatory tone when she stressed that the US commitment to Israeli security is “unshakable” in the face of threats posed by Iran and Syria. AWIP/Jeff Gates: When will Israel attack the USA – again? AWIP: AIPAC has "persuaded" more than three-quarters of the members of the US House of Representatives to sign a letter calling for an end to public criticism of Israel. + Clinton vows 'personal commitment' to Israel's security.
[Editor's Comment:] Please note that Ms Clinton (in principle) could have stated that she was personally committed to peace (in the Middle East). However this is not what she is committed to. -Peace essentially entails justice & dignity for everyone involved. Peace means peace and is different from the mere absence of hostilities. This is not, repeat, not what Israel wants and therefore it is not what Ms Clinton wants either. Her incessant assurances of a personal commitment' is coded politician's lingo and needs to be "translated". They need to be seen as a groveling oath of 'fealty' to the most belligerent state in the Middle East. Israel's "security", then, means billions of $$$, an endless supply of US military hardware and US soldiers fighting & dying for Israel. This is what Israel's "security" means. The long of it, that is. The short of it is simply: 'war'. -Endless wars for Israel. This is what she is personally committed to.