[Audio][Transcript][Editor's Comment:] - Chilling indeed! But this is not Mohammed Atta's voice. The Washington Post is lying. This accent clearly belongs to an Israeli English speaker. It would be anybody's guess whose voice it was but we might be talking about Daniel Lewin. He was a Sayeret Matkal operative (Israeli secret agent) and may have been on one of the planes that the Israelis used for their monstrous terror operation against the U.S. on that fatal September day ten years ago. The task of this Israeli hijacker was to keep the passengers quiet and compliant until the rest of the Israeli terrorists could manage to steer the planes by remote control into the Twin Towers. He may not have known about this particular part of the Israeli terror plan. -He was expendable.

The Zionists would of course have preferred that the presence of Daniel Lewin on one of the planes had remained unknown, but they were only left with the option of spinning the story. And this they did. Beyond recognition. - Now Lewin had become a hero who "battled the hijackers" when they "attacked one of the stewardesses" and the courageous Danny "rose to protect her and prevent [the hijackers] from entering the cockpit". The nauseating spin goes on to say this: "We see it as an act of heroism that a person sacrifices his life in order to save others. An act of heroism that everyone should do at such an instance and particularly suitable for Danny." Very touching.

Everything points in one direction only: Israel. Yes, Israel did it. They did it. It also was an inside job because of the active participation in the crime of FEMA, the FBI, the CIA and the Secret Service. The US has been taken over by the Israeli Zionists. All levels of federal government are completely dominated by them from top to bottom. America no longer is free. America is a tragic joke. -While its citizens were busy stuffing themselves with Kentucky Fried chicken, growing fatter by the day, and watching baseball, taking NO serious interest in politics at all, they lost their country to the Zionists. To Israel.

In response to somewhat vague warnings of a tenth-anniversary terror plot on the United States, security is up in target cities like New York and Washington, DC — and so is official rhetoric. - Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, in the courtyard of the Pentagon, touted the recent murder of Osama bin Laden as a coup for the CIA, of which he was director until last week. For Panetta, known for making factless, bombastic declarations, the operation made a “very clear point… nobody attacks this country and gets away with it.” He did not comment on the many years, thousands of American lives, and trillions of dollars spent looking for one man. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also rattled her saber, vowing the United States would “always” claim the right to use force against those who attack or are deemed to threaten the country. She gave a speech at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, standing next to a rusted piece of the destroyed World Trade Center.

Patrick Martin: New York, Washington in security lockdown on 9/11 anniversary

Egyptians victorious attack on Israeli embassy in Cairo last night leads to a dramatic decision: Israeli Air Force plane returns ambassador, members of diplomatic staff and their families to Israel. - And I wonder, how long will it take before Americans, Brits, Germans, Indians, French, Chinese, Argentinians and others do the same. The people of Egypt are proved to be far more responsible and ethical than their political leaders. The citizens of the world should follow. There is no room for racist ethnic cleanser Israel amongst the nations.

Al-Ahram: The storming of Cairo's Israeli embassy: an eyewitness account

When NATO inserted itself into the Libyan conflict it told the world that the mission was "to protect civilians” from supposed genocidal threats made by Colonel Quathafi.

So why isn’t NATO objecting to the targeted attacks on Black Libyans, and African migrant workers, by these same “rebels?” Is NATO condoning the ethnic cleansing of Blacks in Libya?

With much of Libya now under the control of the armed insurrectionists from Benghazi, the picture of the new Libya that’s emerging is extremely chilling. It’s one of fanaticism and racism. Ironically, these supposed Muslims are more in line with the minority that is characteristic of religious zealotry.

For months now, it has seemed very likely Libya under the insurrectionists would become a stringently religious state—with a twisted view of Sharia law. And for all the claims of "mass rapes" under Col. Quathafi, women now have cause to worry about their liberty under the rule of these regressive charlatans.

Now we must ask: is it possible the rest of Black Africa can have cordial relations with these “rebels” now that their crimes of bigotry are being exposed? Early on in the Libya conflict, charges were made that Col. Quathafi hired legions of Black mercenaries from sub-Saharan Africa. It’s becoming increasingly clear that assertion was not only a lie—but a racist one.

WolkenZwemmer/YT: Black refugees from Libya - interviewed - Video
Peter Symonds: NATO-backed Libyan regime persecutes black Africans

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said Friday that ousted Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi was loved by his people and that the rebellion that toppled him was not a popular uprising.

"This wasn't a popular uprising," like in other north African countries "where the wind of freedom begins to blow," he told young supporters of his People of Freedom party gathered in Rome. "Powerful men decided to give life to a new era by putting out Qaddafi," he said. "This wasn't a popular uprising because Qaddafi was loved by his people, as I was able to see when I went to Libya."

Sergei Balmaso: The United States Will Take Libya’s Oil and Gas by Force [April 5, 2011]

Al-Ahram: Let Gaddafi be - While the killing or capture of Gaddafi and his sons, and in the case of the latter their subsequent appearance at the ICC, might indeed serve justice for some, it will not bring about peace in the country. On the contrary, amongst a good proportion of the Libyan population it will create deep ill feeling towards the National Transitional Council (NTC) and those western countries that have intervened in the conflict. This contention is based on the premise that in Libya and in the wider Arab world there is little respect for or acknowledgement of the ICC: for example, no one was brought to justice after the Jenin massacre in 2002 or the Gaza massacre in 2009. [...] Resolution 1973 was passed in order to institute a no-fly zone in Libya, that is, to enforce peace rather than to trigger war. [...] Questions of honour are not [...] easily brushed aside. Many Arabs, while denouncing Gaddafi and passionate in their desire for his demise, perceive the actions taken by the Libyan rebels as being in response to the dictates of western governments.

The European Commission yesterday issued its strongest "rebuke" yet to Turkey over its [allegedly] threatening behaviour towards Cyprus’ efforts to drill for hydrocarbon reserves within its own Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). - Unfazed, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan continued to raise the stakes in his row with Israel and Cyprus over hydrocarbon explorations in the eastern Mediterranean, vowing yesterday to stop them from exploiting natural resources in the area while also pledging to send warships to escort aid to Gaza. The EU, through Enlargement Commissioner Stefan Fule yesterday “urged Turkey to refrain from any kind of threat, sources of friction or action, which could negatively affect good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of border disputes”.

AWIP: Gas discoveries draw Israel and Cyprus closer together